Here’s an article describing the early impact of Pennsylvania law enforcement’s upgraded and integrated facial recognition capabilities. The system is able to interact with images of persons of interest taken from, e.g. social media accounts, ATM cameras, and other privately owned surveillance systems by running them against the state-wide database of mugshots. If no mugshot match is found, the scraped photo can be put on a watch list, and an investigator will be notified if a matching mugshot is taken some time in the future.
Systems along these lines appear to be the fate of the future. They also appear to based on the assumption that private interests will pay for an install their own surveillance systems, and that law enforcement will be able to access them as needed. The concept of “warrant” does not appear in the article.
This opinion piece demonstrates something we’ve been following for a while — viz. the development of the concept of “security.” Where there was once clear distinction in public discourse between (a) personal security as it relates to national security and geopolitics and (b) personal security as it relates to public health, the post-9/11 world has collapsed that distinction. As you’ll see in this article, the distinction between the catastrophe of a microscopic phenomenon (ebola) and a more macroscopic phenomenon (violence in a continually unsettled Middle East, and the extremism it has engendered) is gone. Both are labeled under the banner of “terror” and “security threat”
After a move away from such a system, there’s been a recent re-growth of for-profit detention centers along the US-Mexico border.